WE
Outlet profile

Washington Examiner

Frequently stakes out contrarian positions

L
RRight
27
Avg divergence
6.1%
Breaks first
79
Peak divergence
1754
Events covered
2782
Articles ingested
41%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is Washington Examiner biased?

Divergence tracks Washington Examiner as right, based on coverage monitored since March 2026. Across 1,754 scored events (2,782 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 27 out of 100, roughly in line with the site-wide average of 26.

Its most common framing is neutral (51% of events, followed by pro-action at 24%). In 41% of the events it covers, Washington Examiner takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and war.

Measured across shared events, Washington Examiner frames stories most like Newsmax (60%), Washington Times (53%) and ABC News (50%), and least like Vox (14% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive19%
Negative31%
Neutral50%
Dominant tone
Neutral
Avg score 0.96i
Framing tendency
Neutral51%
Pro-action24%
Critical21%
Alarmist3%
Dismissive1%
Topic focus
Politics75%
Other9%
War8%
Economy5%
Ai1%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.