I
Outlet profile

The Intercept

Frequently stakes out contrarian positions

L
RLeft
38
Avg divergence
8.3%
Breaks first
67
Peak divergence
46
Events covered
92
Articles ingested
72%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is The Intercept biased?

Divergence tracks The Intercept as left, based on coverage monitored since May 2026. Across 46 scored events (92 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 38 out of 100, above the site-wide average of 27.

Its most common framing is critical (72% of events, followed by pro-action at 13%). In 72% of the events it covers, The Intercept takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and war.

Measured across shared events, The Intercept frames stories most like HuffPost (68%), Reason (67%) and Defense One (67%), and least like Financial Times (0% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive13%
Negative84%
Neutral3%
Dominant tone
Negative
Avg score 1.0i
Framing tendency
Critical72%
Pro-action13%
Alarmist9%
Neutral4%
Dismissive2%
Topic focus
Politics76%
War9%
Health7%
Ai4%
Economy2%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.