SCM
Outlet profile

South China Morning Post

Often diverges from consensus framing

L
RCenter
23
Avg divergence
4.4%
Breaks first
67
Peak divergence
1267
Events covered
2200
Articles ingested
31%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is South China Morning Post biased?

Divergence tracks South China Morning Post as center, based on coverage monitored since May 2026. Across 1,267 scored events (2,200 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 23 out of 100, below the site-wide average of 27.

Its most common framing is neutral (67% of events, followed by international at 17%). In 31% of the events it covers, South China Morning Post takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and war.

Measured across shared events, South China Morning Post frames stories most like Le Monde (66%), Deutsche Welle (66%) and Reuters (65%), and least like Vox (0% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive8%
Negative27%
Neutral65%
Dominant tone
Neutral
Avg score 1.0i
Framing tendency
Neutral67%
International17%
Critical10%
Alarmist4%
Pro-action2%
Topic focus
Politics47%
Other24%
War13%
Economy10%
Ai4%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.