S
Outlet profile

Semafor

Often diverges from consensus framing

L
RCenter
24
Avg divergence
47
Peak divergence
66
Events covered
347
Articles ingested
27%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is Semafor biased?

Divergence tracks Semafor as center, based on coverage monitored since May 2026. Across 66 scored events (347 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 24 out of 100, roughly in line with the site-wide average of 26.

Its most common framing is neutral (71% of events, followed by critical at 14%). In 27% of the events it covers, Semafor takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and economy.

Measured across shared events, Semafor frames stories most like Axios (81%), New York Times (79%) and PBS NewsHour (77%), and least like The Federalist (0% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive9%
Negative29%
Neutral62%
Dominant tone
Neutral
Avg score 1.0i
Framing tendency
Neutral71%
Critical14%
Pro-action6%
Alarmist3%
Dismissive3%
International3%
Topic focus
Politics44%
Economy20%
Ai17%
War15%
Health3%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.