NYT
Outlet profile

New York Times

Often diverges from consensus framing

L
RLeft
29
Avg divergence
87
Peak divergence
577
Events covered
1364
Articles ingested
26%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is New York Times biased?

Divergence tracks New York Times as left, based on coverage monitored since March 2026. Across 577 scored events (1,364 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 29 out of 100, roughly in line with the site-wide average of 26.

Its most common framing is neutral (69% of events, followed by critical at 27%). In 26% of the events it covers, New York Times takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and war.

Measured across shared events, New York Times frames stories most like The Atlantic (100%), Semafor (79%) and AP News (71%), and least like The Federalist (2% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive3%
Negative32%
Neutral65%
Dominant tone
Neutral
Avg score 0.97i
Framing tendency
Neutral69%
Critical27%
Pro-action2%
Alarmist2%
Topic focus
Politics77%
Other9%
War6%
Economy5%
Health2%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.