JP
Outlet profile

Jerusalem Post

Often diverges from consensus framing

L
RCenter
24
Avg divergence
1.3%
Breaks first
63
Peak divergence
1154
Events covered
2094
Articles ingested
28%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is Jerusalem Post biased?

Divergence tracks Jerusalem Post as center, based on coverage monitored since May 2026. Across 1,154 scored events (2,094 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 24 out of 100, roughly in line with the site-wide average of 27.

Its most common framing is neutral (67% of events, followed by critical at 13%). In 28% of the events it covers, Jerusalem Post takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and war.

Measured across shared events, Jerusalem Post frames stories most like Reuters (68%), Financial Times (65%) and AP News (64%), and least like The Intercept (0% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive8%
Negative33%
Neutral59%
Dominant tone
Neutral
Avg score 1.0i
Framing tendency
Neutral67%
Critical13%
Pro-action8%
Alarmist6%
International5%
Dismissive1%
Topic focus
Politics54%
Other21%
War18%
Economy3%
Ai3%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.