FP
Outlet profile

Foreign Policy

Frequently stakes out contrarian positions

L
RCenter
34
Avg divergence
73
Peak divergence
63
Events covered
302
Articles ingested
57%
Contrarian rate
The data

Is Foreign Policy biased?

Divergence tracks Foreign Policy as center, based on coverage monitored since March 2026. Across 63 scored events (302 articles), its coverage diverges from the cross-spectrum consensus at an average of 34 out of 100, above the site-wide average of 26.

Its most common framing is critical (40% of events, followed by neutral at 35%). In 57% of the events it covers, Foreign Policy takes a framing no other outlet in the cluster shares, one of the higher contrarian rates we track. Coverage concentrates on politics and war.

Measured across shared events, Foreign Policy frames stories most like Jerusalem Post (71%), Financial Times (67%) and Mother Jones (60%), and least like Deutsche Welle (10% agreement).

These numbers are computed, not opinions. They update every 30 minutes as new coverage arrives. How the score, framing labels, and spectrum placement work is documented in the methodology.

Sentiment breakdown i
Positive4%
Negative54%
Neutral42%
Dominant tone
Negative
Avg score 0.93i
Framing tendency
Critical40%
Neutral35%
Pro-action11%
Alarmist8%
International6%
Topic focus
Politics57%
War27%
Economy6%
Other6%
Ai2%
Coverage

Top divergent events

Daily brief
The day's most divided stories, scored and summarized, in your inbox every morning. No account needed.