Other Added 174d ago · originally reported 175d ago Why the delay? Events only appear once a second similar article confirms the story. Additionally, many feeds (especially Google News-proxied sources like CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo) can take 10-20+ hours to index new articles. The pipeline also runs every 30 minutes, so there's always some inherent lag. 2 outlets

Surfer James Eastman was attacked by shark at Big River Beach in California

James Eastman, a 39-year-old surfer, was bitten by a shark on both legs while surfing at Big River Beach in Mendocino Headlands State Park around 5 p.m. on Wednesday. He fought off the shark by hitting its nose, paddled back to shore with help from off-duty lifeguards, and was taken to Adventist Hospital in Fort Bragg. Officials closed beaches for 48 hours following the incident.

8
Divergence score
2 outlets covered it, splitting into 2 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
2 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 2 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
ABC News
NY Post
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
First to report
  1. ABC Newsfirst
  2. NY Post+5.0 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
How each outlet covered it

Lightly covered so far

Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.

Sparse coverage · 2 outlets
ABCABC NewsLEFT-CENTER175d ago

“Surfer speaks out after shark attack”

NYPNY PostRIGHT175d ago

“Surfer seriously injured in shark attack off California coast”

7 tracked claims across 2 outlets
Fact ledger
All7Disputed2Claimed3Corroborated2
1/2
Disputed
The attack occurred just after 5:00 p.m.
Corroborated
Disputed
6 more tracked claims, including 1 disputedSign up free to see the full ledger