Two January 6 police officers sue to block Trump administration's anti-weaponization fund
Photo: Al Jazeera
Politics Added 114d ago 19 outlets

Two January 6 police officers sue to block Trump administration's anti-weaponization fund

Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, filed a lawsuit to block the Trump administration's $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund. The fund was created as part of a settlement of President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns and is intended to compensate individuals who claim they were unfairly targeted by the federal government. The officers argue the fund is an illegal mechanism that could financially reward January 6 rioters and paramilitary groups.

66
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 1% of divergence this week. 19 outlets covered it, splitting into 15 framing camps across 4 bias groups.
15 camps
4 bias groups
The spectrum · how 19 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
Al Jazeera
HuffPost
CNN
Washington Examiner
NPR
Daily Wire
PBS NewsHour
Axios
AP News
ABC News
Reuters
Wall Street Journal
The Hill
Politico
New York Times
Washington Times
Le Monde
NBC News
Bloomberg
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
HuffPost
Trump Will Fund Far-Right Extremists And Militias If Slush Fund Allowed: Lawsuit
funding extremists · negative
Daily Wire
J6 Officers Sue Trump Over $1.8B ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund
administration defense vs critics · neutral
How HuffPost and Daily Wire compare across every story →
First to report
  1. Politicofirst
  2. Reuters+36 min
  3. CNN+7.4 h
  4. ABC News+7.7 h
  5. New York Times+7.8 h
  6. Axios+8.7 h
  7. Washington Examiner+9.2 h
  8. PBS NewsHour+9.4 h
  9. The Hill+9.8 h
  10. HuffPost+10.3 h
  11. Daily Wire+11.7 h
  12. Wall Street Journal+14.9 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
Left decries pardoned rioters profiting from a weaponization pretense; right questions the fund's viability as Trump signals retreat amid international condemnation and internal uncertainty.
How each outlet covered it

Two readings of the same facts

The left and the right lead with different language. The loaded words each chose are highlighted.

THE LEFT6 outlets · mostly critical
Trump adds uncertainty to the status of $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund
NBC NBC News LEFT-CENTER
66DIVERGENCE
THE RIGHT4 outlets · mostly critical
Trump administration’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund gets cold reception from GOP on Capitol Hill
WE Washington Examiner RIGHT
DOWN THE MIDDLE

“What’s Trump’s ‘anti-weaponisation fund’ and why are legal experts alarmed?” · Al Jazeera, PBS NewsHour, Axios, AP News, Reuters, The Hill, Politico, Le Monde

+Hide the full sourcingSee how all 19 outlets put it
7 tracked claims across 19 outlets
Fact ledger
All7Claimed4Corroborated3
9/19
Claimed
The fund will be used to compensate January 6 rioters and paramilitary groups
Corroborated
Disputed