New York Magazine reviews work of writer Ross Barkan after plagiarism allegations
Photo: NPR
Other Added 48d ago 3 outlets

New York Magazine reviews work of writer Ross Barkan after plagiarism allegations

New York Magazine is conducting a review of contract writer Ross Barkan's past work following accusations that he plagiarized content from multiple sources, including The Washington Post, The Intercept, and Compact Magazine. NPR identified at least three instances where Barkan's articles contained passages nearly identical to previously published work, including opening paragraphs lifted wholesale and identical sequences of 30+ words. The magazine updated one story to properly attribute the original reporting after the similarity was flagged on social media.

8
Divergence score
3 outlets covered it, splitting into 3 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
3 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 3 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
NPR
NY Post
Daily Wire
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
The split, in one line
NPR documents specific plagiarism instances with evidence; NY Post reports without detail; Daily Wire frames the plagiarism accusation as politically motivated criticism of liberal media rather than journalistic misconduct.
How each outlet covered it

Lightly covered so far

Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.

Sparse coverage · 3 outlets
NPRNPRLEFT48d ago

“New York Magazine reviewing work of writer facing plagiarism allegations”

NYPNY PostRIGHT48d ago

“'New York' magazine investigating plagiarism claims against writer Ross Barkan”

DWDaily WireRIGHT48d ago

“Reporter Behind Anti-Daily Wire Hit Piece Now Facing Plagiarism Investigation”

Tracked claims from across the political spectrum
Fact ledger
Corroborated
Disputed