Appeals court hears arguments on Trump executive orders targeting law firms
Photo: ABC News
Politics Added 120d ago 6 outlets

Appeals court hears arguments on Trump executive orders targeting law firms

A federal appeals court panel heard arguments Thursday on the Trump administration's attempt to reinstate executive orders that would sanction four major law firms, Perkins Coie, Susman Godfrey, Wilmer Hale, and Jenner & Block, for their past representation of Trump's perceived political opponents. District court judges had previously blocked the orders as unconstitutional. At least nine other firms settled with the administration, agreeing to provide pro bono legal services in exchange for avoiding similar sanctions.

12
Divergence score
6 outlets covered it, splitting into 6 framing camps across 3 bias groups.
6 camps
3 bias groups
The spectrum · how 6 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
ABC News
Reuters
The Hill
New York Times
Washington Examiner
Politico
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
New York Times
Appeals Court Appears Skeptical of Trump Orders Targeting Law Firms
court skepticism toward executive orders · negative
Washington Examiner
Appeals court weighs Trump crackdown on law firms and security clearance revocations
Constitutional authority dispute · neutral
How New York Times and Washington Examiner compare across every story →
First to report
  1. Reutersfirst
  2. ABC News+7.3 h
  3. Politico+12.8 h
  4. The Hill+15.1 h
  5. New York Times+15.9 h
  6. Washington Examiner+19.0 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
Courts intensify scrutiny of Trump's law firm targeting across multiple fronts, with appellate skepticism of executive immunity claims now dominant, while debate persists between separation of powers concerns (conservative outlets) and retaliation/political motivation (liberal outlets).
How each outlet covered it

Broad agreement on what happened

Outlets across the spectrum land in roughly the same place: the shared language is highlighted.

THE LEFT2 outlets · mostly critical
Appeals court to hear arguments over Trump's orders that sought to punish 4 elite law firms
ABC ABC News LEFT-CENTER
12LOW DIVERGENCE
THE RIGHT1 outlet · mostly neutral
Appeals court weighs Trump crackdown on law firms and security clearance revocations
WE Washington Examiner RIGHT
DOWN THE MIDDLE

“Law firms continue fight against Trump EOs” · Reuters, The Hill, Politico

+Hide the full sourcingSee how all 6 outlets put it
6 tracked claims across 6 outlets
Fact ledger
All6Claimed5Corroborated1
1/6
Claimed
The four law firms are Perkins Coie, Susman Godfrey, Wilmer Hale, and Jenner & Block
Corroborated
Disputed