CNN panel debate between Bakari Sellers and Kevin O'Leary over Supreme Court redistricting ruling
CNN commentator Bakari Sellers and Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary clashed on air Monday over a Supreme Court decision allowing Alabama to redraw its congressional map. Sellers invoked civil rights history and told O'Leary not to be dismissive, while O'Leary argued the Constitution grants states the authority to decide redistricting. The exchange became heated with Sellers using profanity to express frustration over O'Leary's tone.
18
Divergence score
2 outlets covered it, splitting into 2 framing camps across 1 bias group.
2 camps
1 bias group
The spectrum · how 2 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
Washington Examiner
NY Post
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
Washington Examiner
'Don't be a d***': CNN commentator clashes with Kevin O'Leary over redistricting
Sellers's civil rights argument center stage · neutral
NY Post
CNN's Bakari Sellers, Kevin O'Leary spar over redistricting: 'Don't be a d–k'
partisan label and conflict spectacle · negative
First to report
- NY Postfirst
- Washington Examiner+3.0 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
Washington Examiner frames O'Leary as defending constitutional authority; NY Post labels Sellers a leftist pundit and emphasizes the heated debate itself over substantive disagreement.
How each outlet covered it
Lightly covered so far
Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.
Sparse coverage · 2 outlets
“'Don't be a d***': CNN commentator clashes with Kevin O'Leary over redistricting”
“CNN's Bakari Sellers, Kevin O'Leary spar over redistricting: 'Don't be a d–k'”
5 tracked claims across 2 outlets
Fact ledger
All5Claimed2Corroborated3
1/2
Claimed
Kevin O'Leary argued that states have constitutional authority to decide redistricting
Source ·Washington Examiner directly quoted O'Leary; NY Post did not specify his argument
Corroborated
Disputed
4 more tracked claimsSign up free to see the full ledger