Federal judge rules Trump administration's DOGE-led cancellation of humanities grants unconstitutional
Photo: PBS NewsHour
Politics Added 126d ago 3 outlets

Federal judge rules Trump administration's DOGE-led cancellation of humanities grants unconstitutional

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in New York ruled Thursday that the Trump administration's cancellation of over $100 million in humanities grants through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) violated the First Amendment and Fifth Amendment equal protection rights, and that DOGE lacked lawful authority to terminate the grants. The judge permanently barred the administration from ending the grants and found that DOGE staffers improperly used race, gender, and DEI keywords, including ChatGPT, to systematically eliminate funding for projects related to Black history, Holocaust testimony, Asian American studies, and other protected categories.

28
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 23% of divergence this week. 3 outlets covered it, splitting into 3 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
3 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 3 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
PBS NewsHour
ABC News
Reuters
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
PBS NewsHour
Judge finds Trump's DOGE-led cancellation of humanities grants unconstitutional
constitutional violation and lack of authority · neutral
ABC News
Judge says DOGE grant terminations are unlawful and 'troubling'
systematic discrimination via AI and protected characteristics · negative
How PBS NewsHour and ABC News compare across every story →
First to report
  1. ABC Newsfirst
  2. Reuters+1.3 h
  3. PBS NewsHour+15.0 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
All outlets confirm the ruling and constitutional violations, but ABC emphasizes DOGE's use of ChatGPT and DEI keywords as systematic discrimination via depositions, while PBS frames it as lack of authority and procedural violation, and Reuters presents it neutrally as unconstitutional and discriminatory without the administrative details.
How each outlet covered it

Lightly covered so far

Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.

Sparse coverage · 3 outlets
PBSPBS NewsHourCENTER126d ago

“Judge finds Trump's DOGE-led cancellation of humanities grants unconstitutional”

RReutersCENTER126d ago

“US judge rules humanities grant terminations by DOGE were unlawful, discriminatory”

ABCABC NewsLEFT-CENTER126d ago

“Judge says DOGE grant terminations are unlawful and 'troubling'”

9 tracked claims across 3 outlets
Fact ledger
All9Claimed3Corroborated6
1/3
Claimed
Grants targeted projects related to Black history, Holocaust testimony, Asian American studies, and Native American history
Source ·ABC News provides specific examples of protected categories targeted; PBS and Reuters do not provide these examples
Corroborated
Disputed