Newt Gingrich and others call for Norah O'Donnell's firing after she read shooting suspect's manifesto on 60 Minutes
Photo: Washington Examiner
Politics Added 136d ago · originally reported 137d ago Why the delay? Events only appear once a second similar article confirms the story. Additionally, many feeds (especially Google News-proxied sources like CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo) can take 10-20+ hours to index new articles. The pipeline also runs every 30 minutes, so there's always some inherent lag. 3 outlets

Newt Gingrich and others call for Norah O'Donnell's firing after she read shooting suspect's manifesto on 60 Minutes

CBS News anchor Norah O'Donnell read portions of an alleged manifesto written by Cole Allen, 31, who was charged with attempting to assassinate President Trump after allegedly rushing a security checkpoint at the WHCA dinner while armed. During a 60 Minutes interview with Trump, O'Donnell read lines from the manifesto and asked the president to respond. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich called the act 'disgusting and inhumane demagoguery' and said O'Donnell should be fired.

22
Divergence score
3 outlets covered it, splitting into 3 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
3 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 3 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
The Hill
Washington Examiner
Breitbart
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
The Hill
Gingrich: 'Disgusting and inhumane' for O'Donnell to read WHCA shooting suspect's manifesto
Gingrich reaction focus
Breitbart
Marlow: Norah O'Donnell Must Be Fired After Elevating Terrorist by Asking President to Respond to Manifesto
editorial call for firing
How The Hill and Breitbart compare across every story →
First to report
  1. The Hillfirst
  2. Washington Examiner+1.7 h
  3. Breitbart+9.3 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
All three outlets echo the same condemnation, but Breitbart frames O'Donnell as elevating a terrorist and demands firing, while The Hill and Examiner focus on Gingrich's criticism with the Examiner adding fuller factual context about the charges and interview.
How each outlet covered it

Lightly covered so far

Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.

Sparse coverage · 3 outlets
HThe HillCENTER137d ago

“Gingrich: 'Disgusting and inhumane' for O'Donnell to read WHCA shooting suspect's manifesto”

WEWashington ExaminerRIGHT137d ago

“Newt Gingrich hits CBS over 'inhumane' reading of Trump shooting manifesto on 60 Minutes”

BBreitbartRIGHT136d ago

“Marlow: Norah O'Donnell Must Be Fired After Elevating Terrorist by Asking President to Respond to Manifesto”

6 tracked claims across 3 outlets
Fact ledger
All6Claimed4Corroborated2
1/3
Claimed
Alex Marlow called for Norah O'Donnell to be fired or to resign over the interview.
Corroborated
Disputed