Two Dan Sullivans appear on Alaska's ranked-choice Senate ballot, prompting a DOJ lawsuit seeking to block certification over voter confusion.
Photo: Washington Examiner
Politics Added 1h ago · originally reported 16h ago Why the delay? Events only appear once a second similar article confirms the story. Additionally, many feeds (especially Google News-proxied sources like CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo) can take 10-20+ hours to index new articles. The pipeline also runs every 30 minutes, so there's always some inherent lag. 2 outlets

Two Dan Sullivans appear on Alaska's ranked-choice Senate ballot, prompting a DOJ lawsuit seeking to block certification over voter confusion.

Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan and a candidate named Dan J. Sullivan both appear on Alaska's ranked-choice ballot. Dan J. Sullivan received 2.5% of the primary vote. The DOJ filed suit to block certification of results if voter confusion affects the outcome. The race pits Sen. Sullivan against Democrat Mary Peltola.

38
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 5% of divergence this week. 2 outlets covered it, splitting into 2 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
2 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 2 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
Washington Examiner
PBS NewsHour
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
Washington Examiner
Alaska Senate race featuring two Dan Sullivans is ‘blatantly corrupt’: Joe Concha
Opinion-driven corruption charge against Democrats · negative
PBS NewsHour
What's going on with Dan Sullivan and Dan Sullivan? The Alaska Senate litigation, explained - PBS
Explanatory litigation explainer · neutral
How Washington Examiner and PBS NewsHour compare across every story →
First to report
  1. Washington Examinerfirst
  2. PBS NewsHour+1.8 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
One outlet frames the ballot confusion as a whole bowl of wrong and blatantly corrupt Democratic maneuvering; the other explains the litigation as a straight procedural question of voter confusion and certification.
How each outlet covered it

Lightly covered so far

Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.

Sparse coverage · 2 outlets
PBSPBS NewsHourCENTER14h ago

“What's going on with Dan Sullivan and Dan Sullivan? The Alaska Senate litigation, explained - PBS”

WEWashington ExaminerRIGHT16h ago

“Alaska Senate race featuring two Dan Sullivans is ‘blatantly corrupt’: Joe Concha”

5 tracked claims across 2 outlets
Fact ledger
All5Claimed3Corroborated2
1/2
Claimed
Dan J. Sullivan received 2.5% of the total vote in the primaries
Corroborated
Disputed