Justice and Education Departments found UC Berkeley Law discriminated against white and Asian applicants in admissions
Photo: The Federalist
Politics Added 5d ago · originally reported 8d ago Why the delay? Events only appear once a second similar article confirms the story. Additionally, many feeds (especially Google News-proxied sources like CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo) can take 10-20+ hours to index new articles. The pipeline also runs every 30 minutes, so there's always some inherent lag. 5 outlets

Justice and Education Departments found UC Berkeley Law discriminated against white and Asian applicants in admissions

On September 9, 2026, the U.S. Justice Department and Education Department issued a joint finding that UC Berkeley School of Law violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against white and Asian applicants in its 2024 and 2025 entering classes. Investigators cited admissions data showing Black applicants had significantly higher odds of admission than similarly qualified white applicants, and accused the school of using diversity essay prompts and identity-based section assignments as racial proxies. Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky denied the findings, stating the school does not consider race in admissions.

17
Divergence score
5 outlets covered it, splitting into 5 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
5 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 5 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
The Federalist
Washington Examiner
NY Post
Reuters
The Hill
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
The Federalist
DOJ Goes After Berkeley Law For Discrimination Against White Applicants
part of broader pattern of schools defying SCOTUS · negative
Reuters
Trump administration alleges UC Berkeley School of Law favors Black applicants in admission
federal allegation of admissions bias · neutral
How The Federalist and Reuters compare across every story →
First to report
  1. The Hillfirst
  2. Reuters+25.8 h
  3. NY Post+32.7 h
  4. Washington Examiner+35.2 h
  5. The Federalist+190.9 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
The Federalist frames this as ideology outranking merit in professional schools; the wires and Examiner stick to DOJ alleges discrimination; The Hill pivots entirely to Trump chilling affirmative action via the IRS.
How each outlet covered it

Only the right is covering this

One side of the spectrum has stayed silent. That absence is itself a signal.

0
LEFT OUTLETS
0 of 5 outlets covering this story sit on that side of the spectrum.
0LEFT OUTLETS
THE RIGHT3 outlets · mostly supportive
UC Berkeley Law intentionally discriminated against white, Asian applicants: Feds
NYP NY Post RIGHT
DOWN THE MIDDLE

“Trump is using the IRS and nonprofit status to chill affirmative action” · Reuters, The Hill

+Hide the full sourcingSee how all 5 outlets put it
7 tracked claims across 5 outlets
Fact ledger
All7Claimed2Corroborated5
1/5
Claimed
The DOJ findings are part of a broader pattern of investigations into law and medical schools including Duke, Yale, UCLA, and UC Davis
Corroborated
Disputed