Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed faces scrutiny over deleted 9/11 tweets and association with Hasan Piker
Photo: The Intercept
Politics Added 11d ago · originally reported 12d ago Why the delay? Events only appear once a second similar article confirms the story. Additionally, many feeds (especially Google News-proxied sources like CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo) can take 10-20+ hours to index new articles. The pipeline also runs every 30 minutes, so there's always some inherent lag. 7 outlets

Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed faces scrutiny over deleted 9/11 tweets and association with Hasan Piker

CBS News reported on deleted social media posts by Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed referencing the September 11 attacks, including posts comparing COVID-19 deaths to 9/11 and mourning casualties of the war on terror. El-Sayed has also faced pressure from within his party to distance himself from Twitch streamer Hasan Piker, who said 'America deserved 9/11' and has expressed support for Hamas. El-Sayed has declined to fully disavow Piker while saying he has no plans to appear with him.

53
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 2% of divergence this week. 7 outlets covered it, splitting into 6 framing camps across 3 bias groups.
6 camps
3 bias groups
The spectrum · how 7 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
The Intercept
CBS News
Washington Examiner
Daily Wire
The Hill
NY Post
Reuters
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
ThreadPart of a 8-story thread: Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed apologized for comments about a March synagogue attack. 08-27 to 09-10 →
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
CBS News
Michigan Democrat Abdul El-Sayed's deleted tweets on Sept. 11 attacks invite scrutiny of past remarks - CBS News
Scrutiny of candidate's past remarks · neutral
Daily Wire
Abdul El-Sayed's 9/11 Problems Just Keep Getting Worse
Escalating extremism concerns · negative
How CBS News and Daily Wire compare across every story →
First to report
  1. CBS Newsfirst
  2. Washington Examiner+14.5 h
  3. The Intercept+33.2 h
  4. The Hill+45.9 h
  5. Daily Wire+49.0 h
  6. NY Post+81.9 h
  7. Reuters+183.0 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
The Intercept calls CBS's reporting manufactured anti-Muslim scandal while Daily Wire frames El-Sayed's 9/11 problems keep getting worse; CBS, The Hill, and NY Post treat it as a political tightrope for the candidate, with Post adding direct association concerns.
How each outlet covered it

Two readings of the same facts

The left and the right lead with different language. The loaded words each chose are highlighted.

THE LEFT2 outlets · mostly critical
CBS News Spins El-Sayed's 9/11 Tweets Into a Manufactured Anti-Muslim Scandal
TI The Intercept LEFT
53DIVERGENCE
THE RIGHT3 outlets · mostly critical
Abdul El-Sayed's 9/11 Problems Just Keep Getting Worse
DW Daily Wire RIGHT
DOWN THE MIDDLE

“El-Sayed walks political tightrope in Michigan with Hasan Piker” · The Hill

+Hide the full sourcingSee how all 7 outlets put it
9 tracked claims across 7 outlets
Fact ledger
All9Claimed3Corroborated6
1/7
Claimed
El-Sayed is scheduled to appear alongside 9/11 truther figures at the Islamic Society of North America convention in Detroit
Corroborated
Disputed