Politics Added 101d ago · originally reported 102d ago Why the delay? Events only appear once a second similar article confirms the story. Additionally, many feeds (especially Google News-proxied sources like CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo) can take 10-20+ hours to index new articles. The pipeline also runs every 30 minutes, so there's always some inherent lag. 2 outlets

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Watson v. Republican National Committee regarding Mississippi's law allowing mail ballots received after Election Day

The Supreme Court heard arguments on whether federal law setting Election Day preempts Mississippi's state law allowing ballots to be received up to five days after Election Day if postmarked by Election Day. Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Brett Kavanaugh raised concerns about how late-arriving ballots could undermine public confidence in elections. Mississippi's solicitor general argued that opponents had not cited fraud examples from post-Election Day ballot receipt.

42
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 6% of divergence this week. 2 outlets covered it, splitting into 2 framing camps across 2 bias groups.
2 camps
2 bias groups
The spectrum · how 2 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
HuffPost
Washington Examiner
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
How each outlet covered it

Lightly covered so far

Too few outlets to map a left-right split. Here is each take as it stands.

Sparse coverage · 2 outlets
HPHuffPostLEFT102d ago

“Samuel Alito's Take On 'Election Day' Is A Real Head-Scratcher”

WEWashington ExaminerRIGHT102d ago

“Samuel Alito concerned late-arriving ballot laws could undermine confidence in elections”

Tracked claims from across the political spectrum
Fact ledger
Corroborated
Disputed