Supreme Court upholds state laws allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day to be counted.
Photo: HuffPost
Politics Added 90d ago 23 outlets

Supreme Court upholds state laws allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day to be counted.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that federal election-day statutes do not prohibit states from counting mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and the three liberal justices. The decision upholds Mississippi's five-day grace period and similar laws in over a dozen states.

47
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 2% of divergence this week. 23 outlets covered it, splitting into 15 framing camps across 4 bias groups.
15 camps
4 bias groups
The spectrum · how 23 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
HuffPost
CNN
Politico
PBS NewsHour
CBS News
Mother Jones
Washington Times
Daily Wire
AP News
NPR
The Federalist
Breitbart
Newsmax
Washington Examiner
Axios
The Hill
Bloomberg
NBC News
NY Post
Reuters
New York Times
National Review
Jerusalem Post
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
HuffPost
Supreme Court Slaps Down Republicans’ Attempt At Dismissing Late Mail-In Ballots
voting rights victory · positive
Washington Times
Trump calls Supreme Court ballot decision 'tremendous loss,' demands passage of voter ID bill
calls for legislative response · negative
How HuffPost and Washington Times compare across every story →
First to report
  1. Reutersfirst
  2. CNN+1.2 h
  3. Daily Wire+3.2 h
  4. Politico+3.5 h
  5. NPR+7.9 h
  6. NY Post+7.9 h
  7. HuffPost+8.0 h
  8. Axios+8.2 h
  9. CBS News+8.4 h
  10. Bloomberg+8.4 h
  11. New York Times+8.5 h
  12. PBS NewsHour+8.5 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
The right warns the ruling undermines public confidence and enables fraud, while the left frames it as protecting voting rights from GOP attacks. Wires focus on the legal outcome sparing election officials mid-year rule changes.
How each outlet covered it

Two readings of the same facts

The left and the right lead with different language. The loaded words each chose are highlighted.

THE LEFT7 outlets · mostly supportive
“The Supreme Court handed Trump an election case defeat. Is a bigger win for him coming?”
CNN CNN LEFT
47DIVERGENCE
THE RIGHT8 outlets · mostly critical
“Trump: Supreme Court Ruling Shows Need for SAVE America Act”
NM Newsmax RIGHT
DOWN THE MIDDLE

“US Supreme Court endorses grace periods for mail-in ballots” · Politico, PBS NewsHour, AP News, Axios, The Hill, Bloomberg, Reuters

+Hide the full sourcingSee how all 23 outlets put it
7 tracked claims across 23 outlets
Fact ledger
All7Corroborated7
22/23
Corroborated
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states may count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward.
Corroborated
Disputed