DOJ argues courts cannot stop Trump White House ballroom construction during appeals hearing.
A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on whether to halt construction of President Trump's 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom. DOJ attorney Yaakov Roth argued that courts lack the power to stop the project, now that the East Wing has been demolished and construction is underway, and that only Congress could intervene. Judges, particularly Patricia Millett, pressed Roth on the implications of this stance using hypotheticals about the Statue of Liberty.
17
Divergence score
11 outlets covered it, splitting into 11 framing camps across 3 bias groups.
11 camps
3 bias groups
The spectrum · how 11 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
Reason
CNN
HuffPost
Washington Examiner
Politico
Washington Times
ABC News
Washington Post
The Hill
Reuters
New York Times
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
Widest split · the two outlets furthest apart, and who published first
Furthest apart on this story
CNN
Takeaways from the appeals court hearing on the White House ballroom project
judicial skepticism highlight · negative
Washington Examiner
DC Circuit grills DOJ over White House bid to continue building ballroom
balanced standing analysis · neutral
First to report
- Reutersfirst
- New York Times+6.9 h
- ABC News+7.0 h
- Washington Post+7.3 h
- The Hill+7.8 h
- Politico+8.4 h
- CNN+8.7 h
- HuffPost+17.3 h
- Washington Examiner+17.6 h
- Washington Times+17.7 h
- Reason+17.8 h
By each outlet's earliest publish time in this story. Feeds that index slowly can appear later than they printed.
The split, in one line
Outlets uniformly report the DOJ's striking claim that no court could stop the project, but split on emphasis: HuffPost and Politico lead with the Statue of Liberty hypothetical, while Reason and Washington Times foreground the legal authority arguments.
How each outlet covered it
Broad agreement on what happened
Outlets across the spectrum land in roughly the same place: the shared language is highlighted.
THE LEFT
“Appeals court to hear arguments over whether Trump's ballroom plans can continue”ABC ABC News LEFT-CENTER
17LOW DIVERGENCE
THE RIGHT
“DC Circuit grills DOJ over White House bid to continue building ballroom”WE Washington Examiner RIGHT
DOWN THE MIDDLE
“US appeals court to hear challenge to Trump's White House ballroom” · Politico, The Hill, Reuters
+Hide the full sourcingSee how all 11 outlets put it
LEFT4
CNNCNN Takeaways from the appeals court hearing on the White House ballroom project 98d ago HPHuffPost Trump Admin Says They Could Raze The Statue Of Liberty If They Wanted, And You Can't Stop Them 98d ago WPWashington Post Courts can't stop Trump's White House ballroom, Justice Department argues 98d ago TNew York Times Appeals Court Panel to Hear Arguments Over Trump's Ballroom 98d ago LEFT-CENTER1
ABCABC News Appeals court to hear arguments over whether Trump's ballroom plans can continue 98d ago CENTER3
PPolitico Trump could also tear down the Statue of Liberty, DOJ argues in defense of White House ballroom 98d ago HThe Hill Trump's White House ballroom heads to appeals court battle 98d ago RReuters US appeals court to hear challenge to Trump's White House ballroom 99d ago 8 tracked claims across 11 outlets
Fact ledger
All8Corroborated8
9/11
Corroborated
DOJ attorney Yaakov Roth argued that courts cannot stop the White House ballroom project, even if found illegal, because it is already underway.
Corroborated
Disputed
7 more tracked claimsSign up free to see the full ledger